Monday, May 24, 2010

Stacey Kent 1



How do you make use of this Series?


This series is an example of using all the basics and all the techniques discussed to actually completely break down a song. Remember that this is only one song and is of simple structure; yet it can be analysed to such a lengthy discussion.

Just listen to the song and see if you note anything special. Repeat that again, and then read through the posts and see whether you've noticed these points or if you had noticed extra points. Gauge your awareness according to this! =)

Why Stacey Kent?

Sweet, slightly nasal tone, with this clear tone that can completely kill you when you first hear her.

Let's talk about the first 35 seconds.

Bass

Bass starts the song. Can you hear how the swing goes? Is he swinging it hard or loose? Can you feel the pulse from just the bassline? I would personally point out that the hallmark of a good backing bassist is the ability to be followed regardless what bassline he gives or is given. Why is the bass groove so catchy? It all boils down to rhythm. Of course great note choices and a clear tone helps a lot over here, but the fact that you can subdivide as you count the beats and he's almost always somewhere where you expect him, is one of the most important reasons as to why it makes sense. It's groovy, catchy because he uses notes which link the two chords together in a seamless way while giving a strong rhythmic emphasis.

Don't take my word for it. Break it down for your own. Where in the beat is he playing? Very often on the off-beats he gives his emphasis when it's not when he wants to imply the pulse too obviously, but at the same time he outlines the chords at the beginning of the two bar phrases very strongly. This gives Stacey Kent this ability to pick up the rhythm and go.

Vocalist

Now to Stacey Kent. Watch her move. She's obviously finding the pulse and getting into the groove. Her "Mmm, hmmm" are all on offbeats and phrased at the same time. Phrasing is a big issue that I'll cover another time. But this ability to get into the groove is something most pop-andtryingtobe-jazz singers CANNOT do. Examples are Michael Buble and many amateurs we see out there. I want all of you to snap on two and four and bob your head and listen to them go.

Do you notice that if you keep with the double bass you feel like you're going too fast? While if you follow Stacey Kent you feel like you're going too slow? This is the classic and lovely setting perfect to illustrate the pushing and laying back. In this case the bass is pushing and the vocalist is laying back. It's an age-old tradition in jazz vocalist training. And it's absolutely precious to the sound of the music. Because by definition, a jazz vocalist is a vocalist who can phrase like a jazz horn player, she would qualify just from the first 35 seconds.

Take Note

One common fault that classical musicians cum pop musicians do is the lack of understanding of the swing beat. The lack of emphasis on the offbeat. Stacey Kent showcases her knowledge of the offbeat with constant laying back and singing on the offbeat of a song that could be sung completely. That is why she's amazing. Why is she so easily appreciated at the same time?

Well firstly Stacey Kent is not one who changes the feel of the song too much. She keeps to medium swing and fast swing mainly and has a very palatable tone in today's pop music scene.

Now go enjoy the video. I'll be commenting on the next parts of the videos. But most importantly judge for yourself whether what I said is the truth about her singing. I'll continue this video on Stacey Kent 2. =)

10 Comments:

At May 25, 2010 at 11:30 AM , Blogger John Wong said...

Touche on the phrasing bit Yi Zhe. It's refreshing to hear an instrumentalist paying attention to what vocalists should be paying attention to.

It is indeed difficult to explain phrasing. Getting it takes long hours listening to the greats like Frank Sinatra (the pioneer in big band swing phrasing IMHO)and Ella Fitzgerald to understand the fluid motion in jazz singing that Stacy does so well.

Both artists should be studied closely. Some of their best recordings are available now on the Net and it really is a matter of searching for them to listen to.

By the way I am starting a vocal jam (not restricted to jazz) so if any keen singers wish to sing this Sunday evening please come on down to LA SALSA 11 DEMPSEY HILL (the old Quaru Bar location) at 8pm.

 
At May 25, 2010 at 11:31 AM , Blogger John Wong said...

By the way, Sammy Davis Jr does the solo instrument introdo with the DRUMS instead of the bass for some songs.

Even more killer :-)

 
At May 25, 2010 at 6:20 PM , Anonymous Marcus Lee said...

thanks yizhe for setting up such a blog! i'm sure it'll definitely help all of us and jazz members of the future!

i totally dig this video and i absolutely love stacey kent and this is one of my favourites from her! i think the bass is putting his accents on the '3' and the '3 an'. I love the way the other instruments come in as well especially at the last 2 lines of the chorus where sax and piano lock with the singer, giving a subtle and sweet feel. And as you said the use of syncopations from the instruments in the different parts of the song for example the piano at 1:25. About stacey kent's phrasing i think she is indeed pulling back but not to that great an extent. The whole feel of her pulling back is contributed by the selection of her notes and more importantly how long she holds each note and when she starts to subtly let go of them (which are on the off beats), and this creates dynamism in her voice making the whole performance interesting.

just my 2 cents worth on this performance, really love it :D

 
At May 26, 2010 at 11:54 AM , Anonymous AJ said...

"One common fault that classical musicians cum pop musicians do is the lack of understanding of the swing beat. The lack of emphasis on the offbeat."

I add on to this sentence.
Usually classical musicians
reading music notation is
according to the classical
way.

But for swing music,
Take for eg.
2 eighths of a note (equal as the value of 1 whole quaver beat)
for a swing music score,
ppl tend to read/count it as "1 &".

However for jazz, thats not the way to count.
Usually one would have to count the first eighth
as "1 &" and second eighth as "then".
First eighth of the note is divided as 2/3 and the second
eighth of the note is divided 1/3.

That makes the first eighth note slighter longer
than the second eighth note.
Thats probably why classical and pop musicians
get "screwed up" in time rythmn when they play jazz swing
if they dont understand the concept time rythmn of swing.

 
At May 26, 2010 at 12:04 PM , Blogger Seow Yi Zhe said...

Thanks AJ. I think that's a very informative comment.

It's a very well-simplified way of putting it, for even for jazz musicians the "swing beat" is never truly on the 3rd triple of the beat, it's always relative to the speed and the feel of the band.

But that's something further into the music, and hopefully I'll be covering it throughout the life of this blog. =)

 
At May 26, 2010 at 3:26 PM , Blogger AJ said...

=HI Yizhe

My pleasure.
Btw Sorry for the small mistake made
2 eighths of a note (equal as the value of 2 quaver beats instead of 1)

U going for bluzjazz cafe this Thursday to listen to aya instrumental jazz?

 
At May 26, 2010 at 3:33 PM , Blogger Seow Yi Zhe said...

Hey AJ. I think it's a very small mistake. Means 1 whole crotchet yeah? =)

I sadly am unlikely to make it for I have my end of posting exams. Might go for a short while if I go. =)

 
At May 29, 2010 at 12:43 AM , Blogger Shirin said...

Stacey Kent is really good!

How would you explain why my heart keeps beating faster even though the music is meant to be slow and swing-ish? Am I following the bass too much then? Thanks! x

 
At May 30, 2010 at 10:07 PM , Blogger Seow Yi Zhe said...

Haha I would suspect it's because of the fact that swing music does emphasis on the off-beat, so there rarely is any resolution. The idea of tension is created by the emphasis on the offbeats, the bass being ahead of the beat (plays earlier than the pulse) and the vocalist and pianist being behind the beat (after the pulse). This creates a tension which is kept throughout the music which is why you feel the tension and thus your heart beats faster. That's what I believe... Because it's like that for people who really listen intently.

 
At June 14, 2010 at 9:17 PM , Anonymous jips said...

My hypothesis for your excitement is the nuances brought out by the singer. She conveys the songs beautifully through her phrasing and rhythmic sense - they imbue so much sass and sexiness.

 

Post a Comment

Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]

<< Home